The case of Marianne “N”, a social media influencer accused of stabbing Valentina Gilabert, continues to provoke intense debate across Mexico. According to reports, Marianne allegedly attacked her ex-boyfriend’s new partner inside an apartment complex in Park Pedregal, Mexico City, leaving Valentina in critical condition and placed in an induced coma.
As Valentina’s family demands justice, the case has divided public opinion. Should gender influence how justice is served? This is the question raised by activist Saskia Niño de Rivera, who has compared this case to that of Fofo Márquez, the influencer sentenced to 17 years in prison for attempted feminicide.
Saskia Niño de Rivera: “Yes, Women Can Be Feminicides Too”
Saskia Niño de Rivera, a well-known activist, shared her opinion on X (formerly Twitter), drawing attention to what she sees as a gendered double standard in the justice system. She wrote:
“Ah, but if it were Fofo Márquez, social media would be on fire.”
She also emphasized that women can also commit feminicide, challenging the assumption that only men are responsible for gender-based violence.
“Yes, there are female feminicides. Valentina is in intensive care, fighting for her life. She was brutally cut with cruelty and hate. Are we staying silent just because the aggressor is a woman?”
This statement sparked widespread discussion, with Niño de Rivera questioning why Marianne’s actions were not receiving the same level of outrage as Fofo Márquez’s case.
Comparing Marianne «N» to Fofo Márquez: A Justified Parallel?
Saskia Niño de Rivera’s comments reference Fernando “Fofo” Márquez, a controversial influencer convicted of attempted feminicide. Márquez was sentenced to 17 years in prison for violently attacking a woman, a case that generated national headlines.
The activist’s argument suggests that public outrage and legal consequences should be consistent, regardless of the perpetrator’s gender. She previously defended Ariadna Imelda Jiménez Medrano, a former director at the Barrientos Prison, who was dismissed after a leaked video showed prison guards beating Márquez.
Public Backlash: Social Media Divides Over Saskia’s Statements
While some agreed with Niño de Rivera, others criticized her for making a misleading comparison. Social media users on X responded with mixed reactions:
- “No, Saskia. Marianne’s case is serious, and no one is defending her. She deserves to be judged, but that doesn’t mean Fofo’s case is any less important.”
- “Why compare it to Fofo Márquez? Why not address this as a separate issue? Social media is already discussing Marianne’s case.»
- “Fofo Márquez was sentenced for attempted feminicide. Marianne’s case is still under investigation. Let’s wait for justice before making comparisons.”
Many believe that both cases deserve attention, but some argue that Niño de Rivera’s framing unnecessarily fuels a gender divide instead of focusing on justice.
What’s Next for Marianne “N” and the Investigation?
Marianne “N” remains in legal limbo as authorities determine the severity of the charges. Given the gravity of the attack, she could face charges for attempted murder or feminicide, depending on how the case develops.
The outcome of this case will set a precedent in Mexico’s legal system. It will test whether justice applies equally, regardless of gender, and whether public perception influences legal decisions.
TE PODRÍA INTERESAR